Nice idea about the slippiness of photographs, and the rest of the dialogue about the issues with photos and art.
Not long ago, two writers on photography found themselves in broad agreement when each approached some pretty fundamental questions at the core of photography in curiously similar terms. One wrote (and posted a short video) on how it was worth trying to bear in mind that some things patently ‘matter’ in photography and others equally do not. The other wrote that identifying what was ‘at stake’ in a photographic project was a useful way of ascribing value to some things and withholding it from others. At that stage they acted separately. But since writing on subjects like these is all about engaging others in conversation, one invited the other to get in touch, and they have exchanged a number of e-mails batting ideas around.
What follows is a conversation. It is rough and ready, and it is closer to a collection of notes than to finished writing. At the centre…
View original post 6,057 more words